Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00721
Original file (PD2012 00721.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME:    CASE: PD1200721
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20130516
SEPARATION DATE: 20011203


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (31U10/Signal Support Systems Specialist) medically separated for a back condition. He started experiencing low back pain (LBP) in 2001 and was treated with physical therapy, but could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The chronic LBP was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated chronic mechanical LBP as unfitting, rated 10%, with cited application of the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39 and AR 635-40. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Service connected condition has worsened and increasingly interfered with job limitations and basic home life with family making basic actions such as remaining sitting or standing either not possible or painful to the point proper concentration is not possible. After realizing it was available, I have sought management of injuries to back and knee through VA health care over past 2 years with only minimal success (see 12) using prescription drugs to slightly mask severity. After pursuing all options available to better understand and minimize my disability I have been told resolution is unknown and that issues are only likely to continue to worsen over time with age which is the opposite of what I was initially told when exiting military service (once exiting military environment improvement expected). I imagine this false presumption also played a role in disability percentage awarded. Although occurrences with my knee (rated 10%) have sustained (occasional pain, slowed mobility, restless) but not worsened in severity the trouble with my back (rated 10% also) has significantly impacted my basic function and posed a myriad of on the job restrictions (both mobile and stationary) and impacted home life with my young children. The only comfortable position for me is leaning back while sitting (most things involve leaning forward). When standing > 20 seconds (even to simply brush my teeth) I must pace around or seek support of counter/wall to reduce strain on back or be so consumed by the stress on my back that I am unable to focus on much else and eventually must exit the environment when I simply can't tolerate any further. Are these significant limitations representative of the disability percentage awarded? Thank you for your review.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting chronic mechanical LBP condition is addressed below. The knee condition, as per the contention, was not identified by the MEB or PEB; and, thus is not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. This, and any other condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected conditions continue to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws.


RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB – Dated 20010913
 VA - (~2 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Mechanical LBP
 5299-5295 10% Lower Back Strain 5295 10% 20010928
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 2 20010928
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 11121 (most proximate to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The 2002 Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which must be applied to the Board’s recommendation IAW DoDI 6040.44, differ significantly from the current §4.71a general rating formula for the spine. The applicable coding options for this case are excerpted below.

         5295 Lumbosacral strain:
         Severe; with listing of whole' spine to opposite side, positive Goldthwaite's sign,
         marked limitation of forward bending in standing position, loss of lateral motion
         with osteo-arthritic changes, or narrowing or irregularity of joint space, or some
         of the above with abnormal mobility on forced motion ...................................................40
         With muscle spasm on extreme forward bending, loss of lateral spine motion, unilateral,
         in standing' position ......................................................................................................     20
         With characteristic pain on motion ...................................................................................   10

Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain Unfitting Condition. The CI initially presented with lower back pain in January 2001. Despite conservative management, he continued to report worsening lower back pain without radiculopathy. X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations were normal. An orthopedic consultation in April 2001 attributed the LBP to a ¼ inch right leg length discrepancy and a heel orthotic was prescribed. At the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam, approximately 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported an 8 month history of LBP with sleep disturbance. The MEB examination was normal except for midline at the L1 area tenderness to palpation.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination 3 months prior to separation the CI reported 9 out of 10 waxing and waning pain daily with bending, lifting, and prolonged standing. He reported that stretching intermittently helped with the pain. The C&P examination was normal except for pain with back flexion and extension.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and VA rated the chronic LBP condition at 10% with similar coding, 5295 (lumbosacral strain). Characteristic pain with motion, as evidenced within the service treatment records and VA examination, satisfied the 10% disability rating criteria. There was no evidence of spasms or loss of lateral spine motion for a higher disability rating of 20%. Considering the totality of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), members agreed that a disability rating of 10% for the chronic LBP condition was appropriately recommended in this case. The Board concluded therefore that this condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on DoDI 1332.39 and AR 635-40 for rating chronic LBP was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of this policy and regulation by the Board. In the matter of the chronic mechanical LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain
 5299-5295 10%
COMBINED
 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120606, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




                  Physical Disability Board of Review


 SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB),

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130012156 (PD201200721)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00778

    Original file (PD2012-00778.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The 2001 Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation, were changed on 23 September 2002 for code 5293 (intervertebral disc syndrome) criteria, and then changed to the current §4.71a rating standards on 26 September 2003. At the MEB exam, the CI had limited flexion with pain, whereas at the C&P exam, the CI had full ROM with pain. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01174

    Original file (PD-2012-01174.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20020516 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Mechanical LBP 5299-5295 10% Low Back Condition 5292 10% 20020807 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. An X-ray of the lumbosacral spine was reportedly normal. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF Acting Director Physical Disability Board of Review SFMR-RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00979

    Original file (PD 2012 00979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200979 SEPARATION DATE: 20020802 BOARD DATE: 20130222 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (12B20/Combat Engineer), medically separated for mechanical non-radicular mid low back pain (LBP). The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01181

    Original file (PD2012-01181.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20021117 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1201181 BOARD DATE: 20130111 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PFC/E-3 (92A10/Automated Logistical Specialist), medically separated for chronic mechanical low back pain (LBP). (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00937

    Original file (PD 2013 00937.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. Neck Pain Condition . The single voter for dissent did not elect to submit a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01395

    Original file (PD 2012 01395.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1201395 SEPARATION DATE: 20020715 BOARD DATE: 20130118 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC, E-4 (MOS 92G10/Food Service Specialist), medically separated for a mechanical low back pain (LBP) condition. The lower right extremity radiculopathy, bilateral knee pain, muscle...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00905

    Original file (PD2011-00905.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the chronic left foot and ankle pain condition and mechanical LBP condition as unfitting, rated 10% and 0% respectively, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Left Foot and Ankle Pain Condition . The PEB’s 0% rating was based on an assessment that the condition was characterized by “slight subjective symptoms only.” The VA’s 20% rating was assigned for “muscle spasm on extreme forward bending, loss of lateral spine motion,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00708

    Original file (PD2012-00708.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB rated the condition 10% based on pain on forward motion under the 5295 code for lumbosacral strain. The VA reported 90 degrees of lumbar forward flexion and ROMs were consistent with near-normal ROMs from the AMA guidelines in effect at the time, and the Board adjudged these as slight limitation (IAW 5292, Spine, limitation of lumbar motion). Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF Director Physical Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00117

    Original file (PD2013 00117.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Spine surgery evaluation concluded there was no indication for surgery.The MEB physical examination on29January 2002 (DD Form 2808) recorded “ROM 45 degrees anterior flexion” but did not specify whether this was lumbar spine or trunk motion.The orthopedic MEB narrative summary addendum examination on30March 2002, recorded back flexion with fingers reaching to mid shin (approximately 70 degrees), similar to the physical therapy examination the year previously.There was tenderness to palpation...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01538

    Original file (PD2012 01538.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I also reported mental health issues that were reported but not listed with my discharge. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the LBP...